Home Guide Application myths

Fact check

Application myths and what the research says

Six seconds per CV, a hidden job market of 70 per cent, the first 90 seconds decide everything: many application rules sound plausible but don't stand up to scrutiny. Here are 31 of them, each with a source.

  • 31myths checked
  • 8topics
  • 41studies and reports
Myth Recruiters only look at your CV for 6 seconds. Measured 16 seconds per CV on average, in the only scientific eye-tracking study

How we check

Every statement comes from our knowledge base on applications and careers: over 500 studies and official reports, with the key findings cross-checked by independent reviewers. We point out a study's limitations where they matter, for example if it was only conducted in the USA. As of October 2026.

Applying without the myths: get support

Free and no obligation. Prefer to message directly? WhatsApp

How can we reach you? (one of the two is enough)
Do you already have an AVGS voucher?
Would you like to add anything? (optional)

We store your enquiry encrypted and send it via Telegram to Janosch and to the coach responsible for your area, so that someone gets back to you quickly. More in our Privacy Policy.

Sources

  1. IAB-Stellenerhebung: Kubis 2026, IAB-Forum
  2. IAB-Stellenerhebung, time series 2015 to 2022: Federal Government 2024, Bundestagsdrucksache 20/10904
  3. van Hooft et al. 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. Faberman & Kudlyak 2019, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics
  5. Lahey & Oxley 2021, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
  6. TheLadders 2012, company brochure (origin of the 6 seconds)
  7. Eriksson & Rooth 2014, American Economic Review
  8. Weisshaar 2018, American Sociological Review
  9. Mehrabian & Wiener 1967, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  10. Lapakko 2007, Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal
  11. Ranehill et al. 2015, Psychological Science
  12. Elkjær et al. 2022, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  13. Frieder et al. 2016, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  14. Melchers et al. 2020, International Journal of Selection and Assessment
  15. Petrowsky et al. 2025, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  16. Brenzel et al. 2014, Labour Economics
  17. Kugler et al. 2018, Psychological Bulletin
  18. Leibbrandt & List 2015, Management Science
  19. Loschelder et al. 2016, Psychological Science
  20. Leib et al. 2021, Management Science
  21. Lally et al. 2010, European Journal of Social Psychology
  22. Singh et al. 2024, Healthcare
  23. Harvard Library, Ask a Librarian: Harvard/Yale study on written goals
  24. Swann et al. 2023, Health Psychology Review
  25. Hagger et al. 2016, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  26. Vohs et al. 2021, Psychological Science
  27. Hoff et al. 2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  28. O'Keefe et al. 2018, Psychological Science
  29. McCrae & Costa 1989, Journal of Personality
  30. Pashler et al. 2008, Psychological Science in the Public Interest
  31. Brown 2023, Frontiers in Education
  32. Chadi & Hetschko 2018, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
  33. Kammeyer-Mueller et al. 2013, Academy of Management Journal
  34. Boswell et al. 2009, Journal of Applied Psychology
  35. XING survey 2026, report on onlinemarketing.de
  36. Voßemer & Schuck 2016, European Sociological Review
  37. Eby et al. 2008, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  38. Czepek & Moczall 2017, IAB-Kurzbericht 08/2017
  39. Derous & Decoster 2017, Frontiers in Psychology
  40. Ejrnæs & Kunze 2013, Scandinavian Journal of Economics
  41. Bundesbericht Wissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs 2021, Bundestagsdrucksache 19/29090